Critical Care Medicine

Objective We aimed to evaluate the performance of the recently updated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score-2 (SOFA-2) on organ dysfunction classification and prognostication compared to SOFA-1 in critically injured trauma patients. Methods Adult trauma patients admitted to critical care at four urban Major Trauma Centres between 2011 and 2024 were included. Daily organ dysfunction scoring was performed using SOFA-1 and SOFA-2 until death or discharge. The primary outcome was MODS, defined as SOFA score [&ge;]6. Results In 2162 severely injured patients (median Injury Severity Score 25 [IQR, 17-34]), SOFA-2 reduced the proportion of patients classified as having MODS compared with SOFA-1 (61.6% vs 68.5%, p<0.001). SOFA-2 scores on the first day after admission were lower than SOFA-1 (median 6 [IQR, 3-8] vs 7 [IQR, 4-10], p<0.001), driven predominantly by lower respiratory and cardiovascular scoring. Critical care mortality in trauma patients was increased in respiratory, cardiovascular and renal components of SOFA-2 at the higher ends of the scores, consistent with the aims of the SOFA-2 reclassification. A group of 159 severely injured patients (7.3%) classified as MODS by SOFA-1 were reclassified to no-MODS by SOFA-2. Despite this reclassification, these patients had substantially higher ICU mortality (7.5% vs 0.7%, p<0.01), greater ventilator and vasopressor requirements, and longer hospital stays than patients classified as no-MODS by both systems. Conclusions SOFA-2 reduces MODS prevalence in severely injured patients and changes organ dysfunction classification, with lower rates of severe respiratory and cardiovascular dysfunction. This represents an important update in trauma MODS measurement and has implications for future trauma trial design. However SOFA-2 reclassification generates a small cohort a small but clinically significant group with occult MODS that warrants further evaluation in severely injured trauma patients.

Rationale. Racial disparities in outcomes among patients with acute respiratory failure are well-described, but the contributions of clinicians to these disparities have not been evaluated. Objectives. Among mechanically ventilated patients, we evaluated racial disparities in severity of illness trajectories and adapted value-added modeling to quantify nurse and physician relationships with these disparities. Methods. In a retrospective cohort of mechanically ventilated patients across five hospitals between 2018 and 2022, we used generalized estimating equations to model the change in Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score version 2 (LAPS) from the start to end of intensive care unit admission ({Delta}LAPS). Consistent with value-added modeling, we randomly allocated the cohort into development and testing partitions, and fit separate multiple linear regression models of {Delta}LAPS using concurrent nurse and physician assignments (determined at 4-hour intervals), patient race, and clinician-race interaction terms as fixed effects. Clinician-specific and clinician-race interaction coefficients were extracted to determine race-specific value-add for each clinician. We defined the race-contextual value-add difference (RCVAD) as a clinician-level measurement of the difference in that clinician's value-add between Black and White patients in their care; a positive RCVAD indicates a more favorable severity of illness trajectory for Black relative to White patients and vice versa. Measurement and Main Results. Among 6,555 distinct patients, 7,247 clinical encounters, 405 nurses, and 70 physicians, Black patients accounted for 2,926 (40%) encounters. Overall, Black patients had significantly less improvement in {Delta}LAPS than White patients (difference in LAPS decline = 2.26 [0.23, 4.29], p=0.029). In the development partition, median nurse RCVAD was -0.10 (interquartile range [IQR]: -1.17, 1.14) with 191 (47%) nurses having a positive RCVAD; median physician RCVAD was -0.18 (IQR: -1.34, 0.56) with 29 (41%) having a positive RCVAD. Conclusions. Black mechanically ventilated patients experience less improvement in severity of illness during intensive care unit admission than White patients. While the majority of physicians and nurses were associated with disparities-exacerbating illness trajectories, many other clinicians were associated with disparities-mitigating trajectories. Future work to understand practices associated with disparities-exacerbating and disparities-mitigating care profiles could inform interventions to reduce disparities overall.

Purpose To estimate the per-protocol effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategies on ICU-acquired infection in critically ill adults with sepsis using a target trial emulation framework. We evaluated whether restrictive strategy and liberal strategy, defined by hemoglobin (Hgb) thresholds, differ in their effect on ICU-acquired infection during ICU stay. Methods We conducted a target trial emulation using the MIMIC-IV database and included adults who met Sepsis criteria at ICU admission. Clones were assigned to restrictive or liberal transfusion strategies. Under the restrictive strategy, RBC transfusion was permitted only when Hgb was [&le;]7.0 g/dL, whereas under the liberal strategy, transfusion was permitted when Hgb was >7.0 g/dL. The primary outcome was the first ICU-acquired infection occurring at least 72 hours after ICU admission. Per-protocol effects were estimated using a clone-censor-weight approach with a marginal structural model. A parametric g-formula was used as a complementary analysis that jointly modeled ICU discharge and ICU mortality as competing events to derive strategy-specific 28-day cumulative incidences and risk differences. Results 8 Among 4,013 eligible ICU stays, the liberal-versus-restrictive comparison provided little evidence of a difference in the risk of ICU-acquired infection (adjusted conditional OR, 0.954; 95% CI, 0.797 to 1.142). In the complementary g-formula analysis, the 28-day risk difference for the liberal versus restrictive comparison was -0.02 percentage points (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.11), consistent with the primary analysis. Findings were generally robust across prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion In this target trial emulation of adults with sepsis, we observed no clinically meaningful difference in ICU-acquired infection between RBC transfusion strategies defined by hemoglobin thresholds.

Background Despite numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs), current sepsis guidelines continue to issue only weak recommendations for corticosteroids. We examined the clinical scope, underlying study pools, and mortality conclusions of SRs evaluating corticosteroids for sepsis. Methods We conducted a meta-research study of SRs on corticosteroids in sepsis (2015 to 2025), extracting SR characteristics, mortality results, and included RCTs. Study-pool overlap was assessed using an SRxRCT inclusion matrix, Jaccard similarity (J), and hierarchical clustering. SRs and RCTs were classified according to standardized Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) profiles. We explored discordance in short-term mortality conclusions among clinically comparable SRs and potential associations with study-pool composition, target populations, and methodological characteristics. Results Forty-two SRs including 121 unique RCTs were identified. More than half of pairwise SR comparisons shared no RCTs, and only three pairs showed high overlap (J>0.8). SRs addressing similar intervention and target population profiles frequently relied on different study pools. Among 38 SRs with short-term mortality meta-analyses, 15 (39%) reported benefit and 23 (61%) no evidence of effect. Discordance occurred exclusively among SRs evaluating broad, non-specific corticosteroid strategies; conclusions were consistent for hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone (benefit) and hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine (no evidence of effect). SRs including sepsis +/- shock populations more frequently reported benefit than those restricted to septic shock (62% vs 22%), although estimates were imprecise. No single methodological or clinical factor consistently explained discordance. Conclusions SRs addressing apparently similar clinical questions frequently synthesized different underlying evidence bases and reported discordant conclusions. Guideline developers should therefore consider not only methodological quality and reported PICO, but also whether the RCTs included in an SR adequately represent the intended clinical question. Clinically coherent evidence syntheses may improve the interpretability of pooled treatment effects and support more targeted corticosteroid therapy in sepsis.

Purpose. Prognostic assessments after acute brain injury are largely narrative, and how prognostic language relates to subsequent care has not been measured at scale. We quantified where it is written and its association with a subsequent code-status limitation. Materials and Methods. Multidatabase observational study of adults with acute brain injury or a related neurologic emergency, using MIMIC-IV (2008-2019; discharge summaries and radiology reports) and a timestamped MIMIC-III cohort (notes and code-status orders). The exposure was documented prognostic language; outcomes were its association with a subsequent full-code-to-limitation transition, note-stream location, and completeness of documented command-following relative to structured Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor scores. Results. Among 31,993 admissions (27,054 patients; median age, 69 years; 54.9% male), prognostic language in the timestamped cohort (MIMIC-III) was associated with a subsequent code-status limitation after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.9-6.5; unadjusted 14-day cumulative incidence, 40% vs 8.5%), including the comfort-measures component (3.9), a higher-risk subgroup (4.4), and after acute-physiology adjustment (4.1); the association was concentrated in the first 3 days. Non-prognostic severity language showed no comparable association (hazard ratios, 1.1-1.3). Prognostic language localized almost entirely to the narrative (4.9% of discharge summaries vs 0.015% of radiology reports); command-following was undocumented in 55.7% of summaries, and no final-24-hour GCS motor score was charted in 72.8%. Conclusions. Documented prognostic language after acute brain injury was written in the narrative, not structured fields, and was associated with a subsequent code-status limitation after multivariable adjustment. This observational association cannot establish causation but warrants prospective study.

Background Hypercapnia may indicate a primary ventilatory syndrome, a complication of another illness, or an epiphenomenon of severe disease. The presenting context of hypercapnia is poorly quantified, limiting clinical interpretation and synthesis of epidemiologic studies. Methods We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) hospital admissions linked to an emergency department (ED) presentation from 2011 through 2019. Admissions were included if the triage chief complaint was not missing and at least one prespecified criterion for hypercapnia was met: an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for hypercapnic respiratory failure or obesity hypoventilation syndrome, arterial blood gas (ABG) PCO2 45 mmHg, venous blood gas (VBG) PCO2 50 mmHg, or indeterminate-source blood gas PCO2 50 mmHg. Triage chief-complaint text was classified by natural language processing (NLP) into 17 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey reason-for-visit (RFV) categories using a multi-label framework. Primary analyses estimated admission-level RFV category prevalences; secondary analyses compared distributions by overlapping ascertainment indicator, age, and acidemia. Results The total cohort included 11,941 admissions: 1,542 (12.9%) met both blood-gas and ICD-code criteria, 9,958 (83.4%) met blood-gas criteria only, and 441 (3.7%) met ICD-code criteria only. Median age at admission was 68 years (IQR 56-78), and 6,423 admissions (53.8%) were for male patients. Respiratory RFV categories were most prevalent (30.2%), followed by administrative reasons (17.5%), digestive symptoms (14.0%), injuries and adverse effects (14.0%), and nervous-system symptoms (13.8%); categories were not mutually exclusive. Respiratory categories were more common in ICD-positive admissions (50.2%) than in VBG-defined (36.3%) or ABG-defined admissions (27.3%). Injuries and adverse effects were most prevalent among admissions for patients aged 18-39 years (34.4%), whereas respiratory categories increased from 13.7% among admissions for patients aged 18-39 years to 36.5% among admissions for patients aged 80 years. NLP-derived classifications showed mean set-F1 of 0.84 against adjudicated clinician labels in the full annotated benchmark sample. Conclusions Among ED-linked admissions with hypercapnia by diagnosis code, blood gas, or both, respiratory complaints were the most common chief-complaint category but represented fewer than one-third of admissions. Presentation context should be incorporated when defining, comparing, and interpreting hypercapnia cohorts, particularly those ascertained by blood-gas criteria.

Background: Optimal arterial oxygen targets after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remain uncertain. We examined whether arterial oxygen tension on the first arterial blood gas after ROSC is associated with neurological or survival outcomes. Methods: Using the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA Registry, we retrospectively studied pediatric patients (<18 years) with OHCA in whom ROSC was confirmed at or after hospital arrival. Patients were categorized by PaO? on the first arterial blood gas after ROSC as normoxemia (60?200 mmHg) or hyperoxemia (>200 mmHg). Missing covariate data were handled using multiple imputation, and associations were estimated using inverse probability-weighted logistic regression. Outcomes were favorable neurological status at 30 days, defined as a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score of 1?3, and 30-day survival. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed, including analyses using an alternative PaO? threshold, restricting the timing of PaO? measurement, and excluding extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation cases. Results: A total of 189 patients were included (95 normoxemia, 94 hyperoxemia). A favorable neurological outcome occurred in 21 of 95 (22.1%) normoxemia and 13 of 94 (13.8%) hyperoxemia patients, and 30-day survival in 40 of 95 (42.1%) and 42 of 94 (44.7%), respectively. After weighting, covariate balance was achieved with standardized mean differences below 0.1. Hyperoxemia was not significantly associated with favorable neurological outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49?1.77) or 30-day survival (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 0.88?2.54). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusions: Early hyperoxemia after ROSC was not significantly associated with neurological or survival outcomes in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. These findings suggest that a single early PaO? measurement may be insufficient to characterize the clinical impact of oxygen exposure after resuscitation. Future research should focus on phase-specific and individualized oxygen management incorporating serial physiological assessment.

Background: Molecular markers and mediators of adverse post-hospital outcomes following critical illness remain incompletely characterized. Anemia and red blood cell (RBC) indices integrate inflammation, nutritional status, and hematopoietic function, and may represent biological processes that influence long-term outcomes. We therefore examined whether pre-discharge anemia and hematologic clusters derived from correlated RBC indices were associated with one-year mortality among critical illness survivors. Methods: We conducted an exploratory, retrospective cohort study of adult ICU patients discharged alive using MIMICIV. Pre-hospital discharge RBC indices (hemoglobin, red cell distribution width (RDW), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin (MCH), mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and RBC count) were analyzed. Hemoglobin and anemia were first evaluated, followed by Gaussian mixture modeling of standardized RBC indices to identify patient clusters in a derivation cohort (70%) and validated findings in a held-out cohort (30%). Associations with one-year mortality were assessed using multivariable-adjusted Cox models. Results: Among 20,233 ICU survivors with available pre-discharge hemoglobin (median age, 67 years), based on the WHO definition of anemia, 17,247 (85.2%) critical illness survivors were anemic at hospital discharge. Anemia was associated with higher one-year mortality (adjusted HR 1.42, p<0.001). Mortality was 20% overall and decreased across increasing hemoglobin quartiles, from 28.8% to 12.5% (log-rank P<0.005); lower hemoglobin was associated with progressively higher adjusted one-year mortality risk. Six hematologic clusters derived from RBC indices were identified with one-year mortality ranging from 10.1% to 31.4% (log-rank p<0.005). Compared with the lowest-risk group, the cluster characterized by elevated RDW and MCV had a twofold higher adjusted mortality risk (HR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.81-2.53). Conclusion: Both anemia and hematologic clusters derived from standard RBC indices at hospital discharge are associated with one-year mortality following critical illness. These hypothesis-generating findings support further investigation of RBC indices as potential biomarkers for post-discharge risk stratification and of the underlying biological pathways as possible therapeutic targets.

Background: While critical care pharmacists (CCPs) are broadly associated with improvements in outcomes for critically ill patients, operationalizing staffing in the intensive care unit (ICU) requires further study. The purpose of this evaluation was to determine the relationship of a CCP on interprofessional rounds for weekday admissions of ICU patients on patient-centered outcomes. Methods: This post-hoc analysis of the Optimizing Pharmacist-Team Integration for ICU Patient Management (OPTIM) study included adults admitted to an ICU on a weekday in the multicenter observational study. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The primary exposure was level of comprehensive medication management (CMM) during the first 24 hours of ICU stay. A secondary exposure was pharmacist-to-patient ratio. Multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to estimate associations between mortality and patient, ICU, and institution variables. Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazards regression estimated hazard of discharge alive (HDA) from the ICU and hospital and hazard of extubation alive. Results: 21,835 patients met inclusion criteria, and 76.1% of patients had CMM delivered on interprofessional rounds. Patients who had no CMM on the first ICU day had an increased risk of mortality of 23% (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.04-1.46, p=0.02) compared to those who received CMM on interprofessional rounds. Patients with no CMM also had decreased HDA from the ICU and hospital and decreased hazard of extubation alive. No difference was seen in any outcomes when comparing other levels of CMM (CMM delivered outside of interprofessional rounds or abbreviated CMM) compared to CMM delivered on rounds. Conclusions: Absence of pharmacist CMM on the first day of ICU stay for patients with weekday admission was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, but no difference was seen in other levels of CMM: this signal supports further investigation in prospective analysis.

Background Agenda-setting is a fundamental patient-centered communication practice in which a clinician works with a patient to elicit, propose, and organize topics for discussion during a clinical encounter. Various agenda-setting interventions have been developed, including patient-facing tools and clinician training, but their effects have not been systematically evaluated. We aimed to determine the effects of these interventions on encounter, patient, care partner, and clinician outcomes. Methods We searched grey literature and seven databases, including PubMed, from inception through July 2025 for randomized and non-randomized comparative studies of interventions designed to promote or improve clinical visit agenda-setting. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data, with a third reviewer resolving conflicts. We assessed risk of bias using RoB 2 for randomized studies and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. We conducted random effects meta-analyses when outcomes were sufficiently comparable, assessed heterogeneity using I2, and rated certainty of evidence using GRADE. Post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses examined study design, adjustment status, and intervention structure. Results Twenty-nine articles describing 22 unique studies met the inclusion criteria, including 13 randomized and nine non-randomized studies. Agenda-setting interventions increased the occurrence of agenda-setting (risk ratio 5.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.06 to 14.28, I2=34.6%) and favored the intervention for concerns addressed when measured as a continuous outcome (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.57, I2=65.3%) and overall clinician satisfaction (SMD 0.50, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.78, I2=0.0%). There were no clear differences in the number of concerns raised (mean difference (MD) 0.21, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.61, I2=59.6%), visit duration (MD 0.64 minutes, 95% CI -0.83 to 2.12, I2=51.4%), or overall patient satisfaction (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.15, I2=47.0%). Potentially important heterogeneity was present for four of these six outcomes. Post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses did not provide clear evidence that effects varied by study design, adjustment status, or intervention structure. Risk of bias was often high, serious, or critical, and certainty of evidence was low or very low for all pooled outcomes. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive synthesis of clinical visit agenda-setting interventions. Such interventions may increase the occurrence of agenda-setting and the extent to which patient concerns are addressed without increasing visit length. However, the certainty of evidence was low or very low, and the available evidence does not establish a superior intervention structure.

Background. A primary constraint on the capacity of EMS programs to meet industry demand is psychomotor instruction and verification, requiring direct observation of each student by a qualified evaluator. Whether AI video analysis can relieve it is untested; none has been applied to EMS skill examination or compared with human examiners. Objective. To quantify human EMS evaluator inter-rater reliability and evaluate an AI video-analysis platform against it. Methods. In a prospective, fully crossed study, five certified EMS evaluators and an AI platform independently scored identical video-recorded EMT performances of cervical collar application (n=15), bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation (n=14), and medical assessment (n=15) on dichotomous checklists with critical-failure criteria. Agreement was assessed at item, score, and decision levels using Fleiss' kappa, Krippendorff's alpha, Gwet's AC1, and ICC(2,1)/ICC(2,k). Results. Human item agreement was moderate (kappa 0.409 to 0.467), as was single-rater reliability (ICC(2,1) 0.539 to 0.694), against good panel reliability (ICC(2,k) 0.854 to 0.919). Recorded pass/fail agreement was fair (kappa 0.297 to 0.388) and critical-failure agreement near zero for two skills (kappa 0.028, 0.119). AI alignment tracked rubric observability rather than task complexity: r = 0.857 (collar, exceeding every human), -0.173 (BVM), 0.664 (medical), and it was most lenient on two skills. Conclusions. Human evaluators are an imperfect standard, especially on critical failures. The AI was a legitimate additional rater where checklist items were discrete and visually verifiable, but not where credit required judging continuous quantities such as ventilation rate, volume, or suction duration. Defensible uses are formative and archival, not summative. These results reflect an early, non-specialist configuration: a baseline, not a limit.

Background: The condition of a patient with acute stroke often changes within hours of ICU admission. Prognostic work here targets fixed endpoints predicted from admission data, and trajectory phenotyping assigns one label per patient. We used longitudinal ICU data to identify interpretable dynamic clinical states, characterize transitions between them, and relate the current state to later events. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 6368 adults with acute stroke in MIMIC IV v3.1. The first 72 h were divided into twelve 6-hour windows, and a hidden Markov model was fitted to 21 neurological, physiological and organ support variables. State number was chosen against criteria fixed before fitting: statistical fit, restart stability, state occupancy and clinical interpretability. Generalized estimating equations related the current state to new mechanical ventilation and vasopressor use within 12 h, and to ICU death within 72 h. Eleven sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness of the state solution. Results: Four states were selected: neurologically preserved-low support, neurological impairment low support, impairment renal dysfunction and impairment-respiratory support (63.3%, 7.8%, 11.8% and 17.1% of windows). Within 72 h, 40.3% of patients changed state at least once, and transitions ran in both directions rather than along a single severity gradient. States were identified without outcome data, yet ICU mortality by last state ranged from 2.9% to 43.9%. Adjusted for age, sex, subtype and Charlson index, the current state remained associated with organ-support escalation and death. State prevalence differed by at most 1.1 percentage points between training and test sets, and 10 of 11 sensitivity analyses gave a stable four-state solution (ARI 0.754 0.955). Conclusions: The early ICU course of acute stroke can be represented as movement among a small number of clinically interpretable states. The representation was reproducible in a held out set and across admission eras, but requires validation in an independent database before any clinical use.

Introduction Hospitalised community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is heterogeneous in aetiology, severity, and outcome. Phenotyping and endotyping approaches offer potential to stratify patients biologically and guide targeted therapy, but require well-characterised cohorts with linked biosamples. We describe the PARIS (Pneumonia: Acute Respiratory Infection +/- Sepsis) study: a prospective observational cohort of hospitalised patients with pneumonia, designed to characterise functional outcomes and to provide a biobank for translational immunological research. Methods Adults admitted with CAP to a single NHS district general hospital were enrolled within 24 hours of admission between December 2020 and March 2022. Clinical, functional, and physiological data were collected at enrolment, hospital discharge, and 6-8 week follow-up. Serial blood samples were collected for flow cytometry, transcriptomics, pathogen DNA detection, and plasma biobanking. Results Forty-seven patients were enrolled (15 without and 32 with sepsis [SOFA >=2] at enrolment); 87% met sepsis criteria by 24 hours post enrolment. Most patients (30/47, 64%) were managed as COVID-19, microbiologically confirmed in 27. Mean age was 57 years (SD 16), 70% were male, and baseline comorbidity burden was low. Severity was moderate (median NEWS2 4 at enrolment, rising to 6 by 24 hours post enrolment; p<0.001). Mortality was 4/47 (8.5%), with 44/47 (94%) alive at hospital discharge. Median length of stay was 8 days (IQR 5.5-11). Translational samples were collected from the majority: fresh flow cytometry (44/47, 94%), transcriptomics from the sepsis subgroup (31/32, 97%), pathogen DNA sampling (35 samples received across study timepoints; see Table 5), and stored plasma (29/47, 62%). The primary outcome of functional decline (Barthel score decrease >=1.85) occurred in only 1/29 patients with paired assessments (3.4%). Persistent CRP elevation (>3 mg/L) at 6-8 week follow-up was present in 16/31 (52%) survivors with available data. Conclusions The PARIS cohort provides a well-characterised clinical platform and linked biobank to support translational studies of pneumonia and sepsis. The low rate of functional decline reflects the younger, lower-comorbidity, COVID-predominant population recruited. Primary protocol endpoints were not achieved owing to pandemic-related disruption. Data and samples underpin a programme of linked translational studies.

Septic shock caused by fungal organisms is characterized by high mortality and diagnostic complexity. We used the Premier Healthcare Database to characterize antifungal use and fungal diagnoses among adults with septic shock requiring vasopressors admitted between October 2022 through July 2024. Among 12.8 million admission at 886 hospitals, 554,948 met septic shock criteria and were included for analysis. A fungal diagnosis was established in 11,405 (2.1%) of encounters; of these, 3,565 (31.3%) received intravenous antifungal therapy within one day of vasopressor initiation. In the overall cohort, antifungal therapy was initiated in 29,824 (5.5%) within one day of vasopressor initiation; of these, 3,656 (12.2%) were ultimately diagnosed with a fungal infection. In the 116 hospitals reporting microbiological data, a subgroup of 489 encounters with septic shock and culture-confirmed candidemia was identified. In this subgroup, intravenous antifungal therapy was initiated in 43.8% within one day, 63.8% within three days, and 78.9% within seven days. These findings highlight a profound decoupling between fungal diagnosis and treatment--few patients receiving antifungals were diagnosed with an infection that would be treated by these agents, while less than half of patients with septic shock and candidemia received timely treatment. Strategies for greater precision in empiric antifungal use in septic shock are needed to improve safety, stewardship, and outcomes.

Background: Mortality prediction models often combine early electronic health record data, but the relative prognostic value of baseline vulnerability, physiological severity, treatment exposure, and procedure burden remains unclear. Objective: To compare routinely available first-24-hour clinical domains for visit-level 30-day mortality prediction and assess whether domain-level patterns replicated in MIMIC-IV. Methods: We used CHoRUS, an OMOP-formatted acute-care dataset, with independent domain-level replication in MIMIC-IV. CHoRUS included 22,098 visits among 5,892 unique patients, with 1,004 30-day mortality events and 4.5% mortality prevalence. MIMIC-IV included 23,000 acute-care visits among 10,006 unique patients, with 819 events and 3.6% prevalence. Across both datasets, 45,098 visits and 15,898 unique patients were analyzed. Predictors were restricted to the first 24 hours after visit start. Performance was evaluated using AUPRC, AUROC, Brier score, calibration, sensitivity at 90% specificity, highest-risk 10% analyses, decision-curve analysis, and SHAP summaries. Because 30-day mortality was infrequent, the classification task was class-imbalanced. Accordingly, AUPRC was interpreted relative to the prevalence-based no-skill baseline, rather than as an absolute measure alone. Results and Conclusion: Physiological severity produced the largest improvement beyond baseline in CHoRUS, with median AUPRC 0.38 and median AUROC 0.86, and showed the same primary domain-level pattern in MIMIC-IV. Treatment exposure and procedure burden provided smaller gains. In CHoRUS, the best pairwise model combined baseline, physiological severity, and procedure burden features, with median AUPRC 0.41; the all-domain model was slightly lower, with median AUPRC 0.40 and median AUROC 0.86. In MIMIC-IV, the all-domain model had the highest median AUPRC, 0.25, only modestly above the best pairwise model. First-24-hour physiological severity features therefore provided the most consistent prognostic information across datasets, supporting parsimonious, clinically interpretable acute-care risk models centered on high-quality early physiological data.

ABSTRACT Background: Corticosteroids reduce mortality in severe COVID-19 requiring oxygen or invasive mechanical ventilation, yet emerging data suggest that SARS-CoV-2-associated acute lung injury is biologically heterogeneous and that treatment response may vary across molecularly defined disease states. Lung-derived molecular endotypes of severe COVID-19-associated acute lung injury have been described, but direct molecular profiling is not routinely available at the bedside. We evaluated whether a clinical predictor of previously defined lung molecular endotype identifies heterogeneity in corticosteroid treatment effect among mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Methods: We utilized a single-center cohort of 5,000 patients with COVID-19 treated at the University of North Carolina Hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, to emulate a target trial assessing the effect of corticosteroid receipt on mortality, length of stay, and incident organ support. Confounding was addressed through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Outcomes for severely ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation were compared to the RECOVERY trial results, with subsequent moderation analysis and stratified analysis by clinically predicted lung molecular endotype and vaccination status. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary Outcomes were time to discharge alive and progression to additional organ support. Results: This emulated target trial showed a directionally favorable but non-statistically significant association between corticosteroid treatment and reduced 28-day mortality in patients requiring mechanical ventilation for SARS-CoV-2 infection. A clinical predictor of lung molecular endotype moderated the effect of corticosteroids on 28-day mortality (p-value for interaction 0.038) and identified distinct predicted endotype-specific treatment effect. Corticosteroid treatment was associated with lower 28-day mortality in the predicted Hyper-Inflammatory endotype (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39, 0.99) but not in the predicted Metabolic Dysregulation endotype (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.82, 1.61). We did not detect significant effect modification by vaccination status (p-value for interaction 0.65), although inference was limited by the small, vaccinated subgroup (28-mortality OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37, 1.65 in vaccinated vs 0.94, 95% CI 0.70, 1.26 in unvaccinated). Conclusions: In this target trial emulation of mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19, corticosteroid treatment showed a directionally favorable but non-statistically significant association with reduced 28-day mortality in the overall cohort. However, a clinical predictor of lung molecular endotype identified significant heterogeneity in treatment effect, with benefit concentrated in the predicted Hyper-Inflammatory endotype and no apparent benefit in the predicted Metabolic Dysregulation endotype. These findings support prospective validation of clinically deployable endotype-guided corticosteroid treatment strategies in acute lung injury and ARDS.

Introduction Postoperative analgesic management after minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) should facilitate early recovery while providing adequate pain control. However, direct evidence comparing postoperative remifentanil- and fentanyl-based analgesic strategies after MICS remains limited. We compared these strategies and explored their associations with postoperative recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pain management. Methods This retrospective single-center observational cohort study included patients who underwent MICS via a right mini-thoracotomy between January 2023 and June 2026. Patients were categorized according to postoperative remifentanil- or fentanyl-based analgesia in the intensive care unit. Outcomes included time to extubation, PONV, postoperative pain assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS), additional analgesic use, and intensive care unit length of stay. Multivariable logistic regression examined the association between postoperative opioid strategy and PONV, adjusting for age, sex, and smoking history. Results PONV occurred less frequently in the remifentanil group than in the fentanyl group (20.6% vs 45.0%, P = 0.004), and this association remained significant after adjustment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.56; P = 0.001). Time to extubation was shorter with remifentanil (median, 179 [interquartile range, 134-240.5] vs 247 [190.2-276.5] min; P < 0.001). In contrast, NRS pain scores on postoperative day 0 were higher with remifentanil (3 [1-6] vs 1 [0-2]; P < 0.001), and additional analgesics were used more frequently (80.6% vs 33.3%; P < 0.001). Pain scores on postoperative day 1 did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion Postoperative remifentanil-based analgesia after MICS was associated with less PONV and earlier extubation but also with greater early postoperative pain and more frequent additional analgesic use than fentanyl-based analgesia. Appropriate transition to longer-acting analgesics with multimodal analgesia may help preserve the potential benefits of remifentanil while maintaining adequate postoperative pain control.

We present our Stage-1 Registered Report as a full clinical trial article with all methods in past tense and including mock results, table and figures for the primary analysis. To remind the reader that this Stage-1 article is written before data collection, we highlight in color that these mock results are only for illustrative purposes and will be replaced by the actual results in the Stage-2 Registered Report. Background In patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, optimization of oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a critical. Although both positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) are employed during CPR, their respective impacts on clinically relevant outcomes is yet to be clearly established. Methods This investigator-initiated, pragmatic, registry-based, multicenter, triple-blind randomized controlled superiority trial evaluates whether applying 8 cm H2O PEEP during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves outcomes compared with ZEEP in adults with non-traumatic, non-drowning out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Pre-randomized CPR kits (1:1 PEEP vs. sham) were used by ambulance sites during manual ventilation throughout the resuscitation process. The primary analysis was conducted in the principal stratum of patients who received either a supraglottic airway or endotracheal tube. The primary outcome was neurological status at hospital discharge measured by a utility-weighted score on the modified Rankin Scale. Secondary outcomes included prehospital return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and 6-month quality of life. The primary safety outcome was clinically significant pneumothorax.

Abstract Introduction In-hospital cardiac arrest carries high mortality despite standardized ACLS training. Educators face increasing time constraints in developing assessment tools for ACLS training. Two possible solutions to this problem are using pre-medical students or using artificial intelligence to generate test questions. This study compared the quality of pre-medical student-generated ACLS test questions vs. AI-generated ACLS test questions, testing the hypothesis that AI-generated questions are non-inferior to student-generated questions. Methods Ten pre-medical students created ACLS questions following predefined criteria, while an AI model (Northwell's Artificial Intelligence Hub) generated comparable questions. A blinded ACLS-certified physician evaluated questions on the qualities of Alignment, Clarity, Cognitive Level, and Question Design using a standardized rubric (Likert scale: 1 = poor quality, 5 = excellent). Student's T-test and Chi-square analysis were used to compare the quality of questions on different rubric domains within each arm (student vs. AI) and within one domain (eg, question Clarity) between arms. The Student's T test was used when 2 comparator groups were compared (eg, Clarity of student-generated vs. AI-generated questions) within one arm. The ANOVA test was used when comparing more than 2 comparator groups (eg, Alignment vs. Clarity vs. Cognitive Level) within one arm. Statistical significance was set as a priority at p <0.05. Results Both student-generated and AI-generated questions were of high quality. AI-generated questions achieved the maximum score in the domains of Alignment, Clarity, and Question Design, but fell short of perfect scores in the domain of Cognitive Level (8 of 50 questions were less than 5). Student-generated questions achieved less-than-perfect scores in each domain. No significant difference was found in overall mean question scores between groups (students = 4.79, AI = 4.81; p = 0.9). However, AI-generated questions had significantly-greater Clarity (students = 4.8, AI = 5; p = .0461), while Alignment, Cognitive level, and Question Design showed no significant differences. Conclusion AI-generated questions demonstrated overall quality comparable to those generated by pre-medical students, supporting the potential role of AI as a scalable tool in ACLS educational assessment development. Further studies are warranted to evaluate additional AI platforms and determine optimal integration of AI in medical education assessment design.

Background: Critically ill patients with cancer and sepsis have high in-hospital mortality, but externally validated prediction models are limited. Objective: To develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning framework using first-day intensive care data. Methods: We used MIMIC-IV version 3.1 for development and internal validation and eICU-CRD for external validation. Eligible adults had cancer, an intensive care unit stay of at least 24 hours, and met a prespecified operational sepsis definition. The prediction landmark was 24 hours after admission. The MIMIC-IV cohort included 3,729 stays (training, n = 2, 983; internal validation, n = 746). Same-admission diagnosis-derived variables were excluded, and 345 predictors were retained. Fourteen predictive models and a dummy baseline were evaluated. Frozen pipelines and training-derived thresholds were applied to eICU-CRD without refitting or recalibration. Results: Gradient boosting was selected as the primary model and achieved an internal AUROC of 0.8480 (95% CI, 0.8173-0.8755), AUPRC of 0.6984, and Brier score of 0.1346. Important predictors included Glasgow Coma Scale components, temperature, lactate dehydrogenase, age, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, blood urea nitrogen, and serum lactate. In eICU-CRD (n = 611), gradient boosting achieved an AUROC of 0.7483 (95% CI, 0.7026-0.7919), AUPRC of 0.6243, and Brier score of 0.1709. Random forest had the highest external AUROC in secondary comparisons (0.7731). Conclusions: First-day data supported useful internal discrimination, but performance declined under locked external validation. Multicenter validation, recalibration, threshold assessment, and prospective evaluation are required before clinical implementation.